In trying to figure out why a lot of my beers are lacking any type of malt character or flavor i've tried switching from batch sparging to a no-sparge approach.
the no-sparge technique i've switched to is simply add all of my mash and sparge water to my mash tun at strike and then drain off once at the end of mash. (very thin mash)
the first beer i did like this i anticipated an efficiency of 55% but ended up getting about 70% and thus had to dilute in the kettle with more water. the next 2 beers i've brewed to 70% efficiency and hit target gravity no problem.
The first beer is one of the best beers i've ever brewed, rich malt character... the latter 2 have turned out the same as my previous batch sparged beers.
My question is, how can there be such a difference between the methods? I would think that taking brewing water and rinsing a little bit of remaining sugar out of the mash (batch sparging) would add to the malt character more than just diluting in the kettle with pure water?
i mash in a picnic cooler with cpvc manifold a la how to brew in the bottom, take multiple ph readings throughout the mash and have calibrated all thermometers.
my next beer i plan on doing a normal mash with a typical water/grist ratio and then dilute with brewing water in the kettle. if i understand correctly, i should get a much lower efficiency like i had originally planned on. hopefully this provide a good quality beer but in thinking about it, i can't understand why i would have had this issue with batch sparging in the first place.
tg

